Real pMHC records
Public peptides, matched HLA alleles, and experimental immunogenicity labels.
A working decision platform built on the public TESLA neoantigen benchmark, showing how peptide–HLA candidates are ranked and tested against patient-matched T-cell evidence.
Public peptides, matched HLA alleles, and experimental immunogenicity labels.
Candidates recognized in patient-matched T-cell assays.
Every record is scored by a fold that never trained on it.
VEP-annotated VCF · tumor/normal coverage · RNA expression · pVACtools · MHCflurry · UniProt · DNA Chisel
TESLA labels test whether the model prioritizes experimentally recognized pMHC candidates without scoring a record using a model trained on that record.
Optimize the order of candidates rather than treating every peptide as an isolated binary classification.
Current: OOF baseline · Next: calibrated gradient boosting / neural rankerSeparate a high score from high confidence and flag unfamiliar alleles, motifs, or assay domains.
Calibration · Confidence intervals · Out-of-distribution alertsShow which biological signals increased or reduced rank so scientists can review every decision.
Feature attribution · Counterfactuals · Audit trailChoose the next assay that delivers the most information, then use results to update future ranking.
Candidate → assay → label → retraining → better candidateFLTSVINRV
Patient-matched T-cell testing detected recognition of this peptide–HLA pair.
The platform compounds through a shared data layer, decision layer, and experimental feedback layer. Candidate selection becomes a learning R&D system—not a one-off prediction run.